LOVE LESSONS
Luke 10:25-37 NET
Since we started studying the commands of Christ, we have been looking at those commands chronologically, that is – according to the time when the commands were given, from the first command to the last. But we have skipped a lot of content in the Gospels because those sections do not contain direct commands from Jesus.
We are going to make an exception to that practice in looking at today’s text. It mostly contains a parable that Jesus taught. I have been bypassing the parables because the parables are illustrations that Jesus used, and usually we can find the commands of Christ that relate to the parables and teach directly from the commands.
The parables are designed to illustrate a teaching found elsewhere. This is clear from the term “parable” itself. It comes from two Greek words: пαρα (meaning “alongside”) and βαλλω (meaning “to place”). A παραβολή is a story placed alongside a teaching to illustrate it – to give an example of what is being taught or taught against.
The parable we are going to be looking at today is the well-known parable of the Good Samaritan. I’m making an exception in teaching from this parable today because the command that Jesus is teaching is so familiar to us that most of us assume that we obey it already. That was the case of the religious expert who was talking to Jesus. Jesus used the parable to show this religious expert that he was not doing what he thought he was doing.
In vss. 25-29, we see the context of the parable.
25 Now an expert in religious law stood up to test Jesus, saying, “Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” 26 He said to him, “What is written in the law? How do you understand it?” 27 The expert answered, “Love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and with all your mind, and love your neighbor as yourself.”
28 Jesus said to him, “You have answered correctly; do this, and you will live.” 29 But the expert, wanting to justify himself, said to Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”
We are introduced to a certain expert in religious law. A νομικός was a person learned in the law, but not political or civil law. This person was an expert in the law of God. We would call him a theological scholar. I have known a few theological scholars, and they are usually quite intimidating. These are the kind of people who can quote chapter and verse on any biblical reference and have a keen understanding of any topic about which there is any controversy. You don’t want too many theological scholars in your congregation.
Anyway, this guy is a theologian. Jesus is not intimidated by theologians. Even when he was twelve years old, he was sitting among the teachers in the temple and amazing the listeners with his understanding (Luke 2:46-47). But this theologian stood up to test Jesus. That’s a bad idea by the way. He should have learned from Jesus like those teachers in the temple did. There is nothing we can ever say to teach Jesus anything, and we are never going to catch him in a mistake.
The actual question was “Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” – which is a very important question to ask. This scholar did know his stuff, and he had chosen a question that gets to the point. It recognizes that this life is temporary, so the most important pursuit of human beings who find themselves in this mortal life is about what can be done to turn this mortal life into an immortal one. Unlike many theologians today, he does not assume that human beings were created immortal. The Bible does not teach that, and he knows it.
In answer to his question, Jesus turns the inquiry right back to him. He wants to know what this theologian thinks he should do in order to inherit a permanent life. The scholar is ready with his own answer, and it is directly from Scripture – Deuteronomy 6:5 and Leviticus 19:18). The greatest command is to love, and we are to love God and our neighbor.
Jesus said to this theologian that he had the answer. It is a very rare occasion when Jesus says something like that to any of us. As we read through the Gospels, we keep coming to situations where Jesus asks his disciples a question, and they answer him, and you can just see him facepalming. In fact, he once said to his disciples “You unbelieving and perverse generation! How much longer must I be with you? How much longer must I endure you?” (Matthew 17:17). Compared to Jesus, we are all doofuses.
But this theologian had the right answer. The problem was that he was not living the right answer. He ended up asking a follow-up question because he wanted to justify himself. In other words, he knew the right thing to do, but he wanted Jesus to give him permission to keep not doing it. His follow-up question was “And who is my neighbor?” Jesus taught him this parable as an answer to that question.
In vss. 30-33, we see the characters of the parable.
30 Jesus replied, “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell into the hands of robbers, who stripped him, beat him up, and went off, leaving him half dead. 31 Now by chance a priest was going down that road, but when he saw the injured man he passed by on the other side.
32 So too a Levite, when he came up to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. 33 But a Samaritan who was traveling came to where the injured man was, and when he saw him, he felt compassion for him.
The characters in this parable can be categorized like this: there was one stupid man, two important men, and one hated man.
The stupid man was the man who didn’t have the good sense to avoid traveling alone on the road to Jericho. It was a dangerous road, and anybody who must travel on it should take precautions. Apparently, this stupid man didn’t get the memo. He took off into the valley of the shadow of death with no protection and no company. That made him a sitting duck for bandits who love to prey on the unprotected. The robbers stripped him, beat him up, and went off, leaving him half dead.
As Jesus is telling this story, the Judeans who are gathered around listening are doing some facepalming themselves. They are saying in their minds, “What an idiot. You don’t take that road without protection. He deserves what he got.”
But remember – Jesus is having a conversation with this theologian. He is answering the question “Who is my neighbor.” The theologian is trying to keep up with Jesus’ story, and he is probably trying to figure out what the punch line is. So, he might have asked himself if this stupid man was the neighbor he is supposed to love.
The two important men are the priest and Levite. They are important in the Judean culture. They are important religiously – seen as men of God. They are important socially – seen as positive influences in the community. They are important politically because of their connection to the temple.
The theologian listens to Jesus talk about how these two important men choose to avoid the victim in the story. He probably recalls instances in his own life when he also avoided helping someone for similar reasons. These are men that he would be proud to have in his neighborhood because they bring honor and prestige to any place they live. In fact, he might have had a neighbor who was a priest and another one who was a Levite. But he must admit that they are not acting very neighborly to the victim of the robbers. Mr. Rogers, they are not.
Jesus often put an ironic twist to his parables. In this parable, the hero turns out to be the hated man, the Samaritan. Nowadays, we sometimes use the term Samaritan for someone who helps people in need. But this would never have entered the minds of that theologian or his fellow Judeans. The Samaritans were considered half-breed apostates. They were reviled and despised as enemies. Even the disciples of Christ thought it quite proper to ask him to rain down fire on the Samaritans. They had been flabbergasted when they found Jesus talking to that woman at the well – because she was a woman – from Sychar – in Samaria.
But of all the people in Jesus’ parable, it was a hated Samaritan who was obeying the command to love his neighbor as himself.
In verses 34-37, we see the command of the parable.
34 He went up to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring oil and wine on them. Then he put him on his own animal, brought him to an inn, and took care of him. 35 The next day he took out two silver coins and gave them to the innkeeper, saying, ‘Take care of him, and whatever else you spend, I will repay you when I come back this way.’ 36 Which of these three do you think became a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of the robbers?” 37 The expert in religious law said, “The one who showed mercy to him.” So Jesus said to him, “Go and do the same.”
Everything that this Samaritan did in the parable shows us how to love our neighbor. Notice that the important men avoided the neighbor. They passed by on the other side so that they would not be contaminated or inconvenienced by the trouble the stupid man got into by his stupidity. But he “went up to him.” He dared to get close to the problem because he wanted to help. You can say you love your neighbor all day long, but if you never get close, you can never truly show love. Love cannot be practiced from a distance. You can say from a distance “Be warm and well-fed.” But Love comes with a blanket and a sandwich. You can’t email food and clothing. You must get close enough to bring it.
He bandaged the stupid man’s wounds, pouring oil and wine on them. If he hadn’t done that, the victim might have stayed right there and died. We would say he administered first aid. Our Samaritan was the first responder. Our society has some excellent first responders – police officers and firefighters and medical personnel – but this Samaritan was not a professional. He was just a Samaritan. He was a foreigner in that land, and he had no reason to volunteer other than the fact that he saw the need and had something that he could do to meet that need.
He put his bandaged patient on his own animal, took him to an inn, and took care of him. He planned for his ongoing care. He didn’t look for the man’s family, or try to get the local government to step in. He did what he could do. He showed mercy. Mercy is undeserved love. The Samaritan was not obligated to help this Judean. He was not a neighbor in the political or social sense. He became a neighbor in the moral and biblical sense.
So, when the theologian admitted that it was this Samaritan who was obeying Leviticus 19:18, Jesus told him to go and do the same. You must get past your own personal prejudice to show love to people who are not like you. Go and do the same. You must get past your own sense of importance to stop avoiding people with problems and let their problems inconvenience you. Go and do the same. You must get past your own selfishness when you see people with needs and realize that helping them is going to cost you some of the resources you thought you would reserve for your own needs and that of your own family. Go and do the same.
The command that Jesus highlights in today’s text is to love your neighbor as yourself. The parable exposes the difference between those who say they love and those who love. True happiness may be a warm puppy, but true love is a warm blanket and first aid. Friendship may be expressed by watching a game together. But true love is sharing a donkey and a trip to the nearest inn – and paying the medical bills.
Jesus demonstrated God’s love by meeting us on the road to Jericho. He refused to pass by on the other side. He came to us. He brought healing to us. He paid the price for our complete recovery. The Samaritan was a character in a story, but Jesus is the one who became a neighbor. He was not one of us, but that didn’t matter. He was the most important man ever, but he took the time to meet our needs. None of us deserve what he did for us. If you haven’t figured it out already, we are the stupid man in the parable. Jesus is the hero, and he challenges us to live as he did. The more we show love to our neighbors, the more they will be drawn to the one who we call Lord and Savior.
jeffersonvann 