In Step With The Gospel

Galatians 2:11-14 ESV

11 But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. 12 For before certain men came from James, he was eating with the Gentiles; but when they came he drew back and separated himself, fearing the circumcision party. 13 And the rest of the Jews acted hypocritically along with him, so that even Barnabas was led astray by their hypocrisy. 14 But when I saw that their conduct was not in step with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas before them all, “If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you force the Gentiles to live like Jews?”

In Gal. 2:1-10 Paul explained that the leaders of the Jerusalem Church had approved of his message to the Gentiles, and affirmed that he had been entrusted with the same gospel message as they were.

This week we look at verses 11-14. Here we see Peter taking a trip to the Church at Antioch, a Gentile church which had served as Paul’s launching point.

A problem had developed at Antioch during Peter’s visit. It involved the Jewish believers, whose conduct was suddenly not in step with the gospel.

Things had actually started out very well in Antioch for Peter. He was “going with the flow.”

It was quite different than Jerusalem because this church was predominently Gentile believers.

But Peter had already learned God’s lesson that he should not consider unclean what God accepts. God showed him that truth through visions in Acts 10-11.

So Peter fellowshipped freely with the Gentile and Jewish believers alike.

But then the troublers came. These appear to be the same kind of troublers that are threatening Galatia, and that’s why Paul brings up this story.

As soon as the troublers came, they insisted on dividing up the church into the acceptable and unacceptable.

Peter had a choice to make. He could continue fellowshipping freely based on what God had shown him, or he could cave in to the peer pressure.

He made the wrong choice. He drew back and separated himself.

Remember, Peter was a respected leader in the Christian church. As such, his choice was not just an individual choice. It was a leadership choice.

Sure enough, the rest of the Jews acted hypocritically along with him.

Even Paul’s good friend and co-worker Barnabus was led astray by Peter’s actions.

Now it was Paul’s turn to respond. He could have done the same thing Peter did, claiming Peter’s authority. That would have been the easy thing to do.

But there was a lot at stake here. It was not just the traditions of men, whether Jewish or Gentile. The truth of the gospel was at stake.

So Paul publically opposed Peter.

Paul was being a good friend here. All of us are able to make wrong choices which deny what we profess. If that happens, may God give us a friend like Paul, who cares enough to confront us.

This story is included in Galatians because the Galatian believers were being threatened with the same false teaching that the “certain men from James” had with them when they visited Antioch.

The Galatians would have to make the same choice that Peter did. They would have to repent and get back in step with the gospel that they profess.

This story suggests a few principles for living like a Christian in any age.

When you and I gave our lives to Jesus Christ, we accepted the gospel of the kingdom, and agreed to live by its principles.

Are we still living by those principles? Have we taken on any new habits and practices since then?

__________________________________
LORD, help us to examine ourselves to see if we are still living by the gospel that we accepted when we first came to you.

Entrusted With The Gospel

Galatians 2:1-10 ESV
Then after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, taking Titus along with me. 2 I went up because of a revelation and set before them (though privately before those who seemed influential) the gospel that I proclaim among the Gentiles, in order to make sure I was not running or had not run in vain. 3 But even Titus, who was with me, was not forced to be circumcised, though he was a Greek. 4 Yet because of false brothers secretly brought in- who slipped in to spy out our freedom that we have in Christ Jesus, so that they might bring us into slavery- 5 to them we did not yield in submission even for a moment, so that the truth of the gospel might be preserved for you. 6 And from those who seemed to be influential (what they were makes no difference to me; God shows no partiality)- those, I say, who seemed influential added nothing to me. 7 On the contrary, when they saw that I had been entrusted with the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been entrusted with the gospel to the circumcised 8 (for he who worked through Peter for his apostolic ministry to the circumcised worked also through me for mine to the Gentiles), 9 and when James and Cephas and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given to me, they gave the right hand of fellowship to Barnabas and me, that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised. 10 Only, they asked us to remember the poor, the very thing I was eager to do.

We have seen how Galatians focuses on the gospel message. In 2:7, Paul says that he has been “entrusted with the gospel.”

The same is true of you and me. We have been entrusted with the gospel message.

The challenge for us is to keep faithfully proclaiming the gospel as Paul did.

The reason Paul could keep proclaiming the gospel is that he was not ashamed of it. He believed that it is God’s power for salvation (Rom. 1:16).

Of course, God does not want us proclaiming his truth if we do not back it up by living right.

Paul tells the Philippians “…let your manner of life be worthy of the gospel of Christ” (Philippians 1:27).

Sometimes the things that we do speak so loudly that people can’t hear the words that we say.

The answer is not to stop proclaiming the gospel, but to proclaim it faithfully. Otherwise we will have been running in vain.

Paul asked the Ephesians to pray for him that “words may be given to (him) in opening (his) mouth boldly to proclaim the mystery of the gospel” (Ephesians 6:19).

If Paul needed that, then surely you and I do as well. In fact, this should be a part of our regular prayers for each others.

Instead of just praying “God bless so and so” let’s pray that God give so and so opportunities to share his faith.

For Paul, being entrusted with the gospel also meant that he had to speak out against the troublers that he had referred to in 1:7.

These troublers were not just people with a different theological point-of-view. They were espousing an entirely different kind of salvation.

We need discernment so that we don’t get hung up on petty theological differences. If we do that, noone will listen when we seek to defend the gospel.

The fact is – there are a lot of people out there who just do not understand the gospel message.

Paul says that “the god of this world {Satan} has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. ” (2 Corinthians 4:4).

There were some unbelievers in Jerusalem who were more concerned with the fact that Titus was uncircumcised that the fact that he believed in Christ. Paul refused to give in to their blindness because the integrity of the gospel was at stake.

For Paul, being entrusted with the gospel meant that he had to use the methods that worked best to minister the gospel.

In 1 Cor. 9, he argued that he and Barnabus had the right to be paid for their missionary work, but that they waived that right and supported themselves because they would “endure anything rather than put an obstacle in the way of the gospel of Christ.” (1 Corinthians 9:12).

We need to stop and ask ourselves if what we are doing is accoplishing the task that we want done. If it is not, then we need to have the courage to change. Otherwise, our traditions might be keeping people out of the kingdom.

Paul had a strategy. He would plant churches wherever he went, and leave one of the missionaries who were with him to continue establishing those churches, and he would continue to stay in touch by e-mail (that is Epistle-mail).

For example, he told the Thessalonians that he “sent Timothy, our brother and God’s coworker in the gospel of Christ, to establish and exhort you in your faith” (1 Thessalonians 3:2). He had also sent Timothy to Ephesus for the same purpose. My point is that Paul’s strategy worked for spreading the gospel.

When he was encouraging the Ephesians to have an active prayer ministry, he reminded them that they should also be “wearing for shoes on (their) feet the eagerness to spread the gospel of peace” (Eph. 6:15 NJB).

A strategy is only as good as the willingness of all involved to operate according to the strategy. Paul’s method for reaching the Gentiles with the gospel depended on every believer being eager to spread the gospel, not just every missionary or every minister.

Each of us have been entrusted with the gospel.

Each of us has a sphere of influence to whom we have been called to share the gospel.

No one can reach your sphere of influence like you can. Not your pastors, not your elder, …only you.

____________________________________

LORD, give us all the courage to faithfully proclaim the gospel you have entrusted us with. Give us the strength to defend it against attack. Give us the wisdom to minister it with methods that work, because eternal lives are at stake.

June 2010 Newsletter from the Vanns in New Zealand

You have reached the Newsletter of Jeff and Penny Vann, missionaries with Advent Christian General Conference, currently serving in New Zealand as pastors-at-large with the Advent Christian Conference of New Zealand (ACCONZ). We serve as teaching pastors at Takanini Church of Christ, and Christian LIFE Church, Takanini, Auckland.


photo by Jachin Mandeno

Our friend and fellow pastor David Burge continues to struggle with Leukemia, and is in the hospital for treatments often. He is no longer a candidate for bone marrow transplant, and his doctors are now merely trying to prolong his life. Please continue to pray for a miracle -his complete recovery.

Since Jeff and Penny have been here to take on the preaching and teaching duties at David’s church, he has been busy enjoying life with his wife and children. He is also completing a number of writing projects in which he has invested a great deal of time. Jeff is also serving as editor on some of those projects, and enjoying that task emensely.

You can follow David’s progress at this site: http://davidburge.wordpress.com/


photo by Jachin Mandeno

Jeff has been preaching two concurrent series on Sunday mornings. Galatians: The Gospel of Salvation by Grace is taking the Takanini congregation through the book of Galatians (a chapter a month). Keep On is a series of sermons based on Paul’s commands encouraging the churches to persevere in doing the right thing. Presentation slides,notes and .pdf files of these sermons are available at Jeff’s current web log: http://jeffersonvann.blogspot.com/

This month Jeff begins a new course on New Testament Greek which meets every Thursday night at the church lounge. The course is being scaled back to meet the needs of home-schoolers, but is available for anyone who would like to study God’s word in one of its original languages.

So what has Penny been doing? She handles communion almost every week. She is also getting ready to teach a seminar on the Old Testament.

Our Kids:

Naomi, our youngest, is staying the summer with Liz. She is planning on getting a Summer job there but as of this writing has not been able to. Please pray she can find one.

Connie: Is expecting a baby, so we will have another grandchild soon.

Liz: Just finished teaching another year of school.


We plan a short trip to the South Island June 29th-July 2nd to visit some friends we met while Jeff was at Gordon-Conwell seminary. We’ll probably see snow there.

Please Pray:

1)For Penny as she is rarely busy. After so many years of teaching full time,the down time is very hard.
2)The Takanini church as they adjust to two Americans on their pastoral team.
3)David Burge’s recovery.
4)Our safety as we visit our friends on the South Island.

A Call for A Consistent Walk

Ephesians 5:15-17 ESV

15 Look carefully then how you walk, not as unwise but as wise, 16 making the best use of the time, because the days are evil. 17 Therefore do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is.

Today’s text is just three verses in Ephesians in which the apostle Paul encourages the believers in Ephesus to take a long and careful look at what kind of life they were living.

A very literal translation of the first few words in the text would read “Look carefully how you are walking.” Those words bring two images to my mind.

First, I see a foolish walk. That’s a walk that pays no attention to the obstacles in the path, and therefore is constantly stumbling,.

Second, the wise walk isstraight, careful, and safe.

Paul told the Ephesian believers that before they came to Christ they “… were spiritually dead because of (their) disobedience and sins. At that time (they) followed the world’s evil way; (they) obeyed the ruler of the spiritual powers in space, the spirit who now controls the people who disobey God” (2:1-2).

Their lives had been characterized by sin, conformity to the world, and lack of self-control, because Satan was in control. The world calls it walking in freedom. God calls it walking in foolishness.

Paul had warned the Ephesians not to walk as the Gentiles did, “in the futility of their minds.”

In other words, the Gentiles were following a path, but not giving any thought to where that path would lead. Their feet were moving, but their minds were not there.

When you do that, the least that can happen is that you get lost. To be lost means more than the fact that you are not yet saved. If you stay lost, something dangerous is likely to happen.

Paul said that unsaved are “darkened in their understanding.” This is true regardless of their academic status: they can be doctors or deadbeats.
Their darkened minds do not show up in an IQ test. What reveals a darkened mind is failure to consider God and his ways. That explains how a person can have a brilliant mind and still live an ungodly life. His mind is not disciplined in the right direction. It’s like a spiritual autism. The mechanics are still there, but the relationship is missing.

Paul said that unbelievers are “alienated from the life of God.” Some important connections are missing, and so the life does not work right.

We were not created to act independent of our creator. Genesis tells us that in the garden of Eden, God made regular visits with Adam and Eve. They received guidance and support from him during those visits. After they sinned, God not only banished them from the garden, he also ceased to regularly visit them. The alienation began there.

This alienation is both the cause and the result of ignorance due to hardened hearts.

Now we come to the other option. Paul was encouraging the Ephesians to walk the wise walk. He said that Christians “are his masterpiece, created in Christ Jesus for good works that God prepared long ago to be our way of life” (2:10 ISV).

The wise walk is what we were born again for. It is the first stage of our eternal inheritance – the stage we can take advantage of now. Through this walk, the church is now manifesting God’s wisdom to “…the principalities and powers in heavenly places” (3:10 KJV).

The wise walk is also the way to keep peace in the fellowship. If there is one thing that will destroy a church faster than a fire it is disunity in the fellowship. Paul encouraged the Ephesians to adopt attitudes toward each other that would maintain unity amid a diverse body. That is the secret. It is not developing a doctrine that everyone can support. It is making the unity itself the thing that the church is eager to defend.

Paul encouraged the Ephesians to walk in love as Christ loved us. The love walk that Christ walked took him from heaven to a manger in Bethlehem.

It was a walk in which he “made himself nothing” so that we could become something.
We must be willing to humble ourselves so that God can use that witness to reach someone who needs him.

The wise walk is also centered on God’s will. But in the Bible, the concept of God’s will can mean two things:

It can mean God’s divine sovereign plan. This is the will of God that is going to happen in the future. It is sure because God has planned it, and he cannot fail in any of his plans. But we usually do not know this will.

The will of God that we can know is his desire: what he wants to happen. The Bible reveals this will of God, so we can know it. More importantly, it is this will of God that we are to walk according to.

“Look carefully how you are walking” Paul tells the Ephesians. That’s our challenge as well. We need to be walking the wise walk, not the foolish walk.

_____
Father, give us the courage to walk the wise walk, and KEEP ON walking it consistently – so that the world may know that we are following Christ. May they follow us all the way to Him.

ACST 13. The Immeasurable One

If someone asked you to describe an automobile, it should not be too hard to do. You need merely describe it using common traits of autos, like make, model, chassis type, color, engine type, transmission type, or even the VIN number. We define things based on their similarity or dissimilarity with other things.

We define people the same way. We may say a man is tall, which means that in comparison to other people, his height is greater than the average height. Age, height, hair color, weight, race, regional accent, and general build are often traits that are used to describe or define persons in order to identify them. These categories are useful because people have these differences that make it easy to compare them with other people.

But what if there were a person who was so unique that he could not be compared with any other person on the planet? What if there were a person who could not be described by age, because he always existed, and always will? What if there were a person who had no corporeal expression, so that his height, weight, and appearance could not normally be seen or heard? Such is the case with the God of the Bible. All the normal means of expression and measurement do not apply to Him.

In fact, one of the traditional ways for theologians to describe God has been to use negative statements. In other words, God is described by pointing out who and what he is not. He is immeasurable, immutable, and immortal. Or, to put it in one word: He is infinite. Scientists sometimes speak of space as being infinite, but only because they lack the means of measuring its immensity. The evidence from scripture reveals that God is infinite by nature. Even if it were possible to measure the vastness of space, God’s measurements would still be outside and beyond it.
For explanation purposes, we theologians sometimes convert these negative statements into positive ones. In doing so, we sacrifice accuracy, but we do so in order to express our faith in the One we are trying to define. The positive definitions of God’s being that result from this conversion are that God is omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent.

omnipresent

To say that God is omnipresent is to ascribe all the space in the universe to Him. It “means both that God is not a finite object in space and time besides other objects, and that no finite object, space, or time can exclude God.”1 It is, of course, not possible for human beings to verify that statement scientifically. Not only it it impossible for us to verify God’s presence in any particular space, it is also impossible for the human race to be everywhere if we could observe him. We are defined by our limits, and that prevents us from accurately describing one whose presence is unlimited.

We depend, then, on the evidence of God’s creation and the special revelation of the Bible to affirm this faith statement about God. Since God created everything that exists in all space, it is not unreasonable to assume that he also exists in all that space. One of the differences between the Christian faith and that of the animists is that our God is not limited geographically. We see Him as beyond creation, because he brought all creation into being, and providentially rules over it.

The biblical evidence for this faith statement is abundant. Psalm 139 laments that God is inescapable, but eventually concedes the fact, and seeks God’s scrutiny and guidance. In Jeremiah 23:23-24 God asks, “Am I a God at hand, … and not a God afar off? Can a man hide himself in secret places so that I cannot see him? … Do I not fill heaven and earth?” Here we find a helpful distinction: while some people are aware of the existence of a lot of places, even if they have never been there, God is actually present everywhere at the same time. His omnipresence is not just an extension of his omniscience.

This can be true about God because he is not limited to a corporeal nature. Jesus made this clear when he told the Samaritan woman that “God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth” (John 4:24). It is not just that God lacks a body, but that he lacks the need for a body, since his essence is not defined as ours is. Human beings have spirits, which need bodies to animate, and without which they cannot function. God’s is spirit, and his “body” is the universe.

The implications of God’s omnipresence are awesome. We can be assured of his conscious presence when we gather in his name regardless of the size of the gathering – even if it’s just two or three people (Matt. 18:20; Luke 24:36). Even if we do not feel that presence, it is there. Even if we do not worship as others expect us to, we have not prevented God’s presence. We cannot. There is no place in the universe that is truly God-forsaken, thus we can be assured that he is always with us (Josh. 1:5; Isaiah 41:10; Matt. 28:20). God listens to the prayers of his people no matter where they are. His “calling zone” is not limited (Jer. 29:12-14; Matt. 6:6) because his presence is not limited.

omniscient

God’s awareness is just as extensive as his presence. He knows all things, even the future, just as well as the past. When Christians, Jews and Muslims affirm that God is omniscient, we are saying that he does not have limits to his capacity and consciousness that his creatures have. The attribute of omniscience “describes God’s infinite mind in terms of the intuitive, simultaneous and perfect knowledge of all that can ever be the object of knowledge. It relates to the eternal cognizance of the actual and to the possible and the contingent.”2

Human beings, for example, are capable of learning and growing in awareness, but are limited by factors such as brain capacity, availability of data, and functionality. God has no such limits. He has a complete grasp of everything that is happening now, and an equally complete memory of everything that happened last year on this date, and next year, and next millennium.

Once again theologians are left with the necessity of using approximate and negative language to describe this attribute of God, because there is no other being equal to God when it comes to knowledge. We do not say that God is omniscient because there is a pool of omniscient beings with which he can be compared. It is just as much a statement of our own limits as it is of God’s lack of limits. So we are forced to prove this assertion the same way we proved the assertion of God’s omnipresence. We appeal to God’s revelation of himself in his word.

The Bible reveals that “the LORD is a God of knowledge” (1 Sam. 2:3). He is “perfect in knowledge” (Job 37:16). “He determines the number of the stars; he gives to all of them their names. … his understanding is beyond measure.” (Psalm 147:4-5). He announces the hidden things that we have not known (Isaiah 48:6). He “knows what is in the darkness” (Daniel 2:22).

God challenges his rivals to prove their omniscience by revealing the future or explaining the past (Isaiah 41:21-23). He laughs at the absurdity of putting one’s trust in a mute idol who cannot prove that it is even conscious, while God can prove that he is aware of all things. He challenges his people to remember that he has predicted the things that are now, showing that he alone deserves allegiance (Isaiah 48:3-5).

The concept of omniscience is baffling to human beings, and always has been. As the psalmist says, “Such knowledge is too wonderful for me; it is high; I cannot attain it” (Psalm 139:6). It is far easier to deal with a lesser deity, who does not know all things, so can be tricked into complying to my will by a well-placed insincere prayer, or a charm or ritual to which he must comply, so that I get what I want. But that is not the way God works. He sees both the deed and the motive. He hears both the words and the thoughts behind them.

Since God’s awareness is unlimited, our approach to him must be an open one. we dare not hide who we are with flowery words, or empty praise, like the Pharisee did in Jesus’ story:

“Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee, standing by himself, prayed thus: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all that I get.’ But the tax collector, standing far off, would not even lift up his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, ‘God, be merciful to me, a sinner!’ I tell you, this man went down to his house justified, rather than the other. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted.” (Luke 18:10-14 ESV)

Jesus used this story to teach the kind of attitude we should have as God’s creatures. As we humble ourselves, we assess correctly our position in God’s universe, but when we exalt ourselves (even when we do it with left-handed complements to God as the Pharisee did) we are being dishonest. This dishonesty about ourselves tilts the scale so badly that it reflects upon our view of God. We end up telling God “what a lucky God you are to have me on your side.”

The God of the Bible sees through that hypocrisy and self-delusion. He knows the real score because he knows all things. It is his nature to know the whole truth, while his creatures know only in part (1 Cor. 13:9,12).


omnipotent

Believers are also drawn to extremes when attempting to describe God’s power. His ability is unmeasurable, infinite. He is omnipotent. Since everything that is was created by him, it stands to reason that there are no limits to his power.

‘Ah, Lord GOD! It is you who has made the heavens and the earth by your great power and by your outstretched arm! Nothing is too hard for you (Jeremiah 32:17 ESV).

And Mary said to the angel, “How will this be, since I am a virgin?” And the angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy- the Son of God. And behold, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son, and this is the sixth month with her who was called barren. For nothing will be impossible with God” (Luke 1:34-37 ESV).

Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God.” When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished, saying, “Who then can be saved?” But Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible” (Matthew 19:24-26 ESV).

With God there is nothing that is harder or easier. The only things he cannot do are the things he will not do, that is, things that are against his nature. His “will is never exercised except in perfect harmony with all the other attributes of (his) great and glorious being.”3 He cannot sin, lie, self-destruct, or do anything that would result in his not being who he is. He himself is a constant.

The Name of God

Perhaps this is the reason that he introduced himself to his estranged people in such a peculiar way:

“Moses said to God, “If I go to the Israelites and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they say to me, ‘What is his name?’–what should I say to them?” God said to Moses, “I AM that I AM.” And he said, “You must say this to the Israelites, ‘I AM has sent me to you.'” God also said to Moses, “You must say this to the Israelites, ‘The LORD–the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob–has sent me to you. This is my name forever, and this is my memorial from generation to generation.’” (Exodus 3:13-15 NET).

With a confusing mix of Egyptian gods as a background, the Israelites who were enslaved in Egypt needed proof that the God who promised to deliver them was different. God’s covenant name – Yahveh4 – accentuates that difference. It screams “I am the One who has always existed and always will. It speaks of One who is not bound to the limits that all other beings are, One who is infinite, unmeasurable.

I believe it was this same name that Jesus referred to when he commanded his disciples to make more disciples, baptizing them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit (Matt. 28:19). The three persons of the trinity are equally infinite, each part of the same Godhead, thus they all share the same name. It is this unmeasurable nature that makes God unique. All other gods have a beginning (as spirits originally intended to serve Yahveh). All other gods have limited knowledge and power. Our God is the “I AM,” who has no limits, and no peers.

1 Owen C. Thomas, Ellen K. Woodra, Introduction To Theology. (New York: Church Publishing, Inc., 2002), 103.

2 Allan Coppedge, Portraits of God. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2001), 132.

3 Martyn Loyd-Jones, Great Doctrines of the Bible. (Wheaton, IL: Good News Publishers, 2003), 67.

4 The name Yahveh is believed by many to derive from an ancient form (hvh) of the common verb “to be,” (hyh ) although Beitzel argues that the etymological presupposition is not proven, and the name may have been used in Exodus 3 as an example of paronomasia (See Barry J. Beizel, “Exodus 3:14 and the Divine Name: a Case of Biblical Paronomasia,” Trinity Journal 1 NS (1980) 5-20).